Schedule for
Sunday, 9 March 1997


(Note: Transportation is available between the Crowne Plaza and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Other hotels will provide transportation to and from the Crowne Plaza.)


9-10 a.m., Concurrent Sessions VIII


8.0 Tutorial Values and Religion Salisbury 104

Process STS: How STS Pedagogy Enhances Learning and Teaching

Richard A. Deitrich, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

The context/content controversy addressed by Yager, Fuller's answer to the question whether STS is an academic field or an educational emphasis, and Deitrich's categories of high-church, low-church, and no-church within the STS movement will be explored and discussed. Beneath these broad contours within basic STS understandings lie process STS pedagogical methods, which work well underneath to enrich the entire STS enterprise. Process STS will be explained and experienced by role play, which will take the attendee through a semester's worth of an exemplary STS course.


8.1 Papers Interdisciplinary Salisbury 11

General Perspectives on STS

Science, Technology, and Society: Problems in the Institutionalization of Revolution

Jesse S. Tatum, Vermont College, Port Republic, MD 20676

If academic institutions, as guardians and dispensers of authoritative knowledge, are apologists for the status quo, can we expect them to accommodate a field like"Science, Technology, and Society" (STS) which is founded in a questioning of the very notion of authoritative knowledge? This presentation will be designed to initiate a general discussion of possible means for preserving the revolutionary possibilities inherent in STS pursuits in the academic world. Among other possibilities, I will suggest consideration of a more direct appeal (through publications and by other means) to a latent constituency for new directions in science and technology: ordinary citizens.

Contrasting Perspectives: Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Technology

Paul Durbin, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716

The Chair of the Interdisciplinary Research/Scholarship Assembly will discuss the contrasting perspectives of philosophy and sociology in looking at science and technology.


8.21 Workshop Technology & Engineering Salisbury 200 (Kinnicutt)

Dynamics of a Creative Naval Laboratory: China Lake

Ron Westrum, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI 48197

This presentation reports on a ten-year research project at China Lake Naval Weapons Laboratory focused on China Lake's Technical Director William B. McLean's development of the Sidewinder missile. China Lake was intentionally designed to be a creative environment, based on the World War II Office of Scientific Research and Development's creative culture. Many people think that creativity"just happens" and cannot be designed for; this study asserts just the opposite. It examines the way that the laboratory was put together, its personnel recruited, and its informal operating code established by a series of conscious decisions. These decisions indeed promoted a culture parallel to that of OSRD, by getting the people, the decision-making structure, and the operating rules to embody principles of highly creative environments. A small team, with excellent support from local authority, developed a missile that not only competed with better-funded and annointed efforts actually became a world standard and has remained effective for 40 years.

The presentation will be accompanied by a video on Sidewinder.


8.22 Workshop Technology & Engineering Atwater Kent 116 (Newell)

Challenger and the NASA Mindset: An Accident Waiting to Happen

Angus Mesick and Jeremy Dowdall, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609

This workshop will show a 40-minute video tape created by Jeremy Dowdall, Justin Brand, and Brian Jones of WPI based on the three hours of footage gathered by Mark Maier, then of SUNY-Binghamton, on the Challenger disaster, under the title,"A Major Malfunction . . . .," which was a study of organization behavior focusing on NASA from the time the shuttle program was launched until the Challenger incident. In their excerpted version the authors take issue with Maier's explanation of the Challenger explosion, drawing out another theme in these tapes featuring Roger Boisjoly, the Morton Thiokol engineer who tried to stop the launch.


8.23 Workshop Technology & Engineering Atwater Kent 232

STS Background and Success in Marketing: A Career Line Story

Brian Starr, Boeson, Corp., North Easton, MA 02356

While at WPI in the mid-1980s Brian Starr was one of the first three WPI students to major in STS. His first major project involved a study of why the plastics industry in California was so totally resistant to the use of the pick and place robots produced by a local firm. It was the STS perspective that provided the greatest insight into the company's marketing problems in California, but some misconceptions about the technology were also revealed. Brian now heads his own consulting firm, which also teaches marketing classes and cross communication issues involving the internal dynamics of organizations and relations with potential and existing customers.


8.5 Workshop Education Atwater Kent 233

From"Wired" to"Wireless": A High-Tech Aid for Enhancing Student Discourse in Introductory College Biology

Susan M. Blunck and Phillip G. Sokolove, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228

Imagine a lecture hall where biology students are able to explore their own questions, have the opportunity to offer their understandings, and discuss important issues and problems. Students enrolled in Biology 100 at the University of Maryland Baltimore County are using wireless microphones to communicate with their professors and one another. Debate and discussion are valued and promoted in this course for biology majors. This workshop will provide glimpses into a constructivist classroom and explore how wireless microphones have been used to enhance the discourse dynamic in a large introductory biology course.


8.71 Roundtable discussion Education Salisbury 105

The Predictive Power of the SAT: Does it Vary with Learning Style?

Daniel Atkinson, Shaun McDonough, and Keith Turi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609

Over the last couple of years a small group of professors at Worcester Polytechnic Institute has been profiling their classes with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and/or the GMCS in an attempt to learn more about how their students learn, and a substantial database has been compiled. A group of students has now linked that database with the Scholastic Aptitude Test scores for the respective students in an attempt to find a correlation. This presentation will report the analysis of this data and the significance of the results thus far.


8.72 Workshop Education Salisbury 123

Orientation to the MBTI

Mary McCaulley, Center for the Applications of Psychological Type, Gainesville, FL 32609 and Maureen Moorehouse, Worcester Public Schools, Worcester, MA

This presentation is especially designed for those attending the following plenary session who desire more background about the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Those who have not been administered the MBTI and would like to know their type will be able to fill out the indicator and be scored at this time.


8.73 Workshop Education Fuller 320

The Gordon-Mednick Cognitive Style Measure and the SAT/PSAT: the High School Findings

John Wilkes, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609

This presentation is especially designed for those attending the following plenary session who desire more background on the Gordon-Mednick Cognitive Style Measure. The high school findings suggest that there are differences as large as 146 points in SAT performance between different cognitive types.


8.74 Roundtable discussion Education Fuller 311

Should the SAT Weigh Heavily in Admissions to Engineering? The SAT Debate at WPI

Robert Voss and Blanche Pringle, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609

At WPI Executive Director of Admissions Robert Voss has argued for downplaying SAT scores in admissions while acknowledging that they must be collected due to the tendency of schools to compare their student bodies in these terms. One of his main critics has been Director of Minority Affairs and Outreach Programs Blanche Pringle, who has staunchly maintained that they tell something beyond what can be learned from class rank and high school grades. Pringle has found SAT scores useful, in combination with other social indicators, in her search for latent talent among underrepresented minority groups.


8.8 Roundtable discussion Education Salisbury 121

Investigating an Interdisciplinary Case Study with Preservice Teachers

Ravinder Koul, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

In an effort to promote a comprehensive view of science in their classrooms, teachers and students may find the investigation of controversies particularly rich and useful. The use of such controversies can help students and teachers question the traditional reliance on mono-disciplinary, mono-cultural practices. This presentation examines preservice teachers' perceptions of a controversial case study. Helping preservice teachers delve into the substance of a controversial investigation is a good way to gain an understanding of their perceptions on the practical nature of science, the complex nature of daily decision-making, and the social and institutional dimensions of doing science.


8.9 Workshop Education Atwater Kent 219

Introducing STEP (Science Through Experiments Program)

Emily Rose and Mary Garniewicz, STEP, Worcester, MA 01609

STEP is an inquiry-based curriculum and teacher training program designed to allow students to learn science by working as scientists do. Students work in research teams exploring physical science topics using real scientific equipment. Three successive curricula have been developed and implemented in grades 4, 5, and 6 in 28 Massachusetts schools. Participants in this workshop will explore topics covered in these STEP curricula and discuss STEP philosophy and methods.


10:15-10:30 a.m. Perreault Lecture Hall, Fuller Laboratories


NASTS Membership Meeting


Closing remarks by Robert Yager, NASTS President



PLENARY VI


Sunday, 9 March 1997

10:30-11:30 a.m.

Location: Perreault Lecture Hall, Fuller Laboratories


Introduction: Beverly Nelson, Conference Planning Committee

 

Speaker: Keith McCormick, Comprehensive College Preparation Services

 

Respondents: Robert Schaeffer, FairTest ("America's leading campaigners for testing reform"

 

Representative of College Board or Educational Testing Service

 

Arlene Cash, Director of Admissions, University of Massachusetts (Amherst)


Topic: "What do the WPI PSAT/SAT Studies Tell us About Student Aptitude; Learning Styles; and the Average Performance of Schools and Ethnic Groups?"

 

 

11:45 a.m.

 

Special breakout sessions following Plenary VI

 

A Look at Performance on Actual PSAT Questions by Type: The Impact of the Attractor Items Fuller 311

Keith McCormick, Comprehensive College Preparation Services, Raleigh, NC

 

Can the 100-300 point score differences between the higher and lower scoring MBTI types be explained, at least in part, by their encounters with certain types of questions? If so, is this a flaw in the test, or a key part of the reason that the SAT succeeds in predicting college performance to the limited extent that it does so? An examination of a handful of actual PSAT items provides some tantalizing clues about who does well, why, and what that can tell us about them.

 

The Differentiation Finding: How Can the Same Cognitive Quality Reduce PSAT/SAT Scores in the Urban Working Class and Increase Those of the Affluent? Fuller 320

John Wilkes, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609

 

Three years of increasingly robust studies of the PSAT/SAT using the GMCS have produced a puzzling replicated finding. In some high schools Differentiation ability is associated with a substantial advantage on the PSAT/SAT and in others it actually depresses scores. Overall the two trends cancel to produce only a modest overall relationship. A few intriguing clues from small studies dealing with SES, race, suburban-urban differences (and the performance of the SAT stars with a shot at National Merit Scholarships) suggest a possible explanation. What it all means for the future research agenda and policy deliberations will be a focus of discussion.

 

The Responsible and Appropriate Use of Standardized Tests to Assess the Performance of Schools and School Systems Salisbury 11

James Caradonio, Worcester Public Schools, and James H. Montague, Jr., College Board

 

The College Board has attempted to discourage the use of average SAT scores to evaluate school systems. Still, these numbers appear in the newspaper and the commentary about even small shifts in average scores from year to year is harsh. The trend is downward -- and it is likely to be dropping as larger and larger portions of the student body participate in this testing program. Given what we are learning about the SAT, is there another way to look at these group level numbers that would be more revealing and constructive?

 

The Responsible and Appropriate Use of SAT Results by High School Guidance and College Admission Departments

Joseph Smith, WPI, and Maureen Morehouse, Worcester Public Schools, Worcester, MA

 

The Guidance and Admissions prople coming to this session to process the results of these findings together will be formed into groups of 20-30, half college and half high school representatives, and sent off with a person who really understands the MBTI and a WPI student in the SAT Studies using the GMCS to discuss the implication of these findings. What can we and can't we say, based on SAT scores now? What additional information will have to be collected to make the results meaningful in practice?

 

Planning for STS-13 (in Chicago) Salisbury 125


Sunday Lunch Suggestions:


Box lunches are for sale in Salisbury Labs.

A hot buffet lunch (like that provided at Assembly meetings on Saturday) is available in Morgan Hall Cafeteria for $5.25.


BACK | HOME